Archive for January, 2009

4 New Recruitment Resources

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

Phired Up Productions is proud to announce four new additions to its Free Resources section of the Phired Up website. As a company, we believe in the value of providing helpful, practical, free tools to help fraternities and sororities recruit better. Please share these with all the fraternity men and sorority women you know.

Phired Up's Free Resources are available here.

New Resources

Greek Life Surveys: Surveys are a great way to start conversations with non-Greek students on campus. Approaching a fellow student with a short, 30-second survey can of course get you good information about their opinions, but most importantly, it gives your members a great reason to start up a conversation and shake that person's hand. Here is a blog post that describes how these surveys have been used. Fraternity Version. Sorority Version

Summer Calling Scripts: During summer recruitment for many fraternities, cold-calls are an important component of their recruitment plan. Phired Up's recruitment experts have written two sample scripts for use during those calls. These scripts can be downloaded here.

Membership Organization Recruitment Article: Phired Up's Dynamic Recruitment curriculum can help more than just fraternities and sororities. In fact, Phired Up provides services for all membership organizations. An article is now available for free that was originally only available for purchase through the on-line magazine, E-Volunteerism. Read about applying Dynamic Recruitment to all membership organizations here.

A Personal Dynamic Recruitment Story

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

Submitted by Grant Miller, Delta Kappa Epsilon, Penn State University

Things are looking great this recruitment season, thanks to Josh and his amazing ideas and guidance. We can't thank him enough or explain the impact he had on our fraternity, but we'll be forever grateful.

I came to Penn State and decided to join a fraternity so that I could get involved and meet new people. I wanted to find a place where I could develop personally while still having an impact on others, a place where I could have fun while still learning about myself and others, a place that I could prosper academically and be comfortable. These desires and standards led me to Delta Kappa Epsilon.

During recruitment I saw it all. From fraternities of over one hundred members to houses of 10, from well dressed and affluent fraternity brothers to the more casual hunting and fishing fraternity, I met people from many different backgrounds and walks of life. I felt a deep connection from within me with the gentlemen of DKE, despite a few obvious set backs.

DKE only had 12 active members, many of whom weren't successful in the classroom or involved at all (inside the fraternity or in the campus community). We hadn't hosted a philanthropy in years, weren't involved in the Greek community, and broke every single rule that we could. My mission was clear: I needed to fix DKE.

I was successful, almost immediately, in getting us more involved in the Greek Community, in hosting philanthropies and tripling our community service hours, and finally conforming our social gatherings to the IFC policies. We worked together and began to prosper. There was only one variable missing from the equation: members.

No matter what we tried, no matter who we sought out for help or met with from the Office of Fraternity and Sorority Life or our National Headquarters and no matter how many times we tried to change our image, we couldn't lock down a pledge class of more than three members. We tried so hard, but we were fading fast. We were at our lowest membership ever of 9 members when we met Josh Orendi from Phired Up Productions. Nothing about our fraternity would ever be the same, ever again.

Josh encouraged us to use resources that we hadn't thought of, to fully take advantage of what we had to offer, and, most importantly: to get back to the basics of a values based recruitment system. With the help and guidance of Josh, we put together a recruitment plan that focused on small activities, rather than BIG events. As Josh encouraged, we took the motto and objects of our organization to establish requirements to use when evaluating potential new members and deciding whether or not to give them bids. Josh encouraged us to use our connections and resources in the Greek community to meet new people, to work through people to meet their friends and room mates who might be interested in membership, and to broaden our network across our campus.

As a result of Josh's GREAT ideas and our hard work, we secured a pledge class of 12 in Fall 2007, then 8 in Spring 2008 (tied for largest Spring pledge class at Penn State), and then another 12 in Fall 2008. Things are already looking great this recruitment season, thanks to Josh and his amazing ideas and guidance. We can't thank him enough or explain the impact he had on our fraternity, but we'll be forever grateful.

Grant Miller, Phi Rho Delta Kappa Epsilon, Penn State Class of 2008

Greek Life Survey: A Multipurpose Tool

Monday, January 19th, 2009

by Matt Mattson

An article came out in today's The Brown and White, Lehigh University's Newspaper. The article described a “Greek Perception Survey” that was recently administered to Lehigh students inquiring about their perceptions of fraternity and sorority life at that school.

I was very excited to see this article because unfortunately our fraternities and sororities have done a poor job of actually gathering real data over the years about what our target market thinks of our organizations' products and services. Interestingly, most academic articles that mention the public's perceptoin of fraternity/sorority life that I've seen cite what they perceive as apparent common knowledge that everyone thinks Greek students are drunk, dangerous, and dumb (specifically they cite Animal House, Old School, and other movies as their references). 

Have we really been around for 200+ years without anyone building a consistent way to ask a good cross-section of non-Greek college students what they think of our organizations? I'm hoping I'm wrong and that I just haven't come across that data yet… If I am wrong, please send me the articles (I’d love to correct myself and share those with everyone on this blog): Matt@PhiredUp.com

This Lehigh study looks to have fallen short on participants… at least there weren't enough to please the scientists. The newspaper article doesn't give a lot of detail about the results so I hope to learn more through other media. 

Anyway, there were two points I wanted to make when I started writing this post…

1. We should probably do a better job of learning what our audience thinks of us if we want to be better at recruiting.

2. Administering a survey might be a GREAT recruitment tool in itself.

As to the second point, this past week I was working with the Washington State University chapter of Beta Theta Pi fraternity (a Dynamic Recruitment, M.D. client). I spent a day with them on campus and we planned to do an info table in the student union, which is a pretty common (but often ineffective) recruitment technique. As I prepared for the day, I wanted to give them a task that would do two specific things… 1) Make it easy to start conversations with strangers as they walked by, and 2) Put a lot of names on their Names List. Well, I found that task… A Greek Life Perception Survey. It worked really well!

Here's what we did. We had a table set up in a high-traffic area of the student union. On the table were the normal things… a fraternity flag, some fliers about an upcoming info night, a list to collect names of passerbys, etc. Then, we printed up about 200 copies of a very short, very simple, quarter-page survey. I’ll put the exact words we used in the survey below…

What do you think about fraternities at WSU?

  1. What is your interest level in joining a fraternity at WSU someday? a) Very High; b) High; c) Neutral; d) Low; e) Very Low
  2. Which term best describes fraternities at WSU, in your opinion? a) Influential; b) Meaningful; c) Fun; d) Helpful; e) None of the Above
  3. If you found a fraternity that was truly about intellectual excellence, high standards of moral conduct, and responsible citizenship, would you be interested in joining? a) Yes; b) Maybe; c) No

Please put your name and contact information on the back so we can learn more from you and send a thank you.

Then we confidently approached every male student who passed by and asked them, “Could I get 30 seconds of your time to help us with a survey? I promise, it will only take 30 seconds… I’ll even let you borrow a pen.” As we were saying those exact words, we were using our body language to steer the student over to the table. My personal experience was that I got 90% of the men I approached to fill out the survey because a) it would only take 30 seconds, b) people like to give their opinions, and c) he could see the survey was short because it was only a 1/4 page of paper.

Once we got them to the table we’d reach out our right hand and introduce ourselves so that we at least got the person's name. They’d take about 15-20 seconds to fill out the quick little survey, then they’d look at the last line of the survey (asking for their contact information). This was amazing. Simply because it asked them to turn the page over, THEY DID. But many of them hesitated to give contact information right away… until we just said, “feel free to just put your E-mail address.” Using that language got most people to put down at least some contact information… 

During the day we had the table staffed by 2-5 fraternity men. We collected over 160 surveys (which, most importantly, is 160 handshakes). We collected around 70 names and contact information, including many cell numbers (which is probably more than you've ever collected at a rush event — certainly more than we would have collected if we were just handing out informational fliers). We had a day full of great conversations. We invited everyone to upcoming dinners, activities, and informational sessions. And probably the biggest thing to come out of the day… we built the confidence of many of the members when it comes to approaching strangers and striking up a conversation.

Oh yeah, as a secondary benefit we gathered some interesting data using just those three questions… I haven't compiled the data yet (the chapter has all the surveys still because they're adding the names and contact info to their Names List). 

This survey was simple, valuable, low-risk, cheap, and drove a lot of names onto the Names List. I spent $1.40 on the copies, setting up the table was free, and there were no other fraternities doing anything like this… This is a great idea for an IFC, Panhellenic, NPHC, MGC, or other council to administer as well for its member organizations.

Here's wishing you some good recruiting this week!

The Rules of 40%, 50%, and 4 Handshakes Per Week

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

by Matt Mattson

This blog post explores what it might take for 5 guys in a fraternity to create a chapter that has… a) 50 members, and b) a 90% rejection rate (that means they only choose the best 10% of the people they build relationships with). That's quantity and quality.

The Rule of 40% What do you think?

I recently worked with the staff of Delta Chi Fraternity. They're an incredible group of guys led by an experienced, wise, and well-respected executive, Ray Galbreth. Ray and I were talking about some of the truths of fraternity recruitment, and he hit me with his rule of 40% which I thought was spot on. This rule is simply about what you must do in order to grow to and maintain your ideal chapter size.

Ray suggested that many chapter leaders think that if they want a 40 man chapter, they should initiate 10 men a
year. 10 men x 4 years of college should equal 40 men, right? Wrong. 

In fact, as Ray pointed out, his experience has proven that if a chapter wants to be 40 men, they need to initiate, at a minimum, 40% of their ideal chapter size each year (40 x .40 = 16). In order to account for attrition (drop outs, grade issues, etc.), this is the magic formula to determine your minimum initiation number each year. 

Want to be a 50 man chapter? Initiate at least 20 guys each year. 

Want to be a 100 man chapter? Initiate at least 40 guys each year.
 

The Rule of 50%

Another percentage-based rule we've found to be true is the Rule of 50%. I've never met a chapter that didn't agree with this rule… It is just true. As it turns out (and think about this for your chapter), about 1/2, or 50% of all the men that a) get to know you well, and b) get to know your fraternity, typically end up joining. Think about it. This is just a basic, universal truth. 

Of course this reveals two important pieces of information… 1) You must be pretty nice because 1/2 of the people that get to know you and your fraternity are willing to get down on one knee, raise their right hand, and promise to be your brother forever. 2) If you initiated 12 guys last year, that probably means you built a meaningful relationship with about 24 guys max… Out of the hundreds, and in most cases, thousands of potential members at your school, your whole chapter was able to make friends with 24 dudes. Imagine if you had built a relationship with, say, 48 guys. 

Sounds like you don't have a recruitment problem, you have a friendship problem.

Recruitment Funnel Math

Let's apply these rules and the Dynamic Recruitment model to see what all this math tells us. Let's assume, just for fun, that you want to be a 50 man chapter that is full of the highest quality guys. In order to do this you’d need to be a group that is pretty selective, right? After all, you only want the best guys on campus. Let's see what it takes to make this come true.

The rule of 40% says you need to initiate at least 20 guys this year (and each year after this year). Great. 

The rule of 50% says you need to build meaningful relationships as a chapter with at least 40 guys this year (20 of them just won't want to join you). 

You probably also want to be a selective chapter full of only the highest quality men (using a Values-Based Selection Process). In order to do that, you probably want to only choose the top 10% of the prospects you meet… that's a standard anyone could be very proud of. So let's say you really need 400 meaningful relationships. 

O.K., that's a lot, but it is do-able. Your chapter can hang out with 400 guys this year. What else do we know? Well, in order to build meaningful relationships, we know we need to engage in small activities with people. How many people do we need to invite to small activities in order to get 400 to actually participate with us? Well, we've found that you can probably engage in relationship-building activities consistently with about 75% of your names list, which means you need at least a 534 person Names List in order to consistently and selectively initiate 20 people a year and have a strong 50 man chapter made of only the absolute highest quality people. 

There's your recruitment goal… Can your chapter brothers shake hands with and meet 534 men in the course of a
year? I’ll assume your chapter only has 5 guys that do any work, and your school has 30 weeks of classes. Each of your members would have to shake hands with 107 men during the course of the entire school year. That's 3.6 handshakes a week. 

Can you meet 4 people this week? Seriously… 4 people. Meet one person a day during the week and take Friday, Saturday and Sunday off. Enjoy your weekend. 

If you and 4 brothers can shake 4 hands per week consistently, you’ll have a 50 man chapter made up of the best men on campus. You’ll have a 10% acceptance rate / 90% rejection rate (a ratio any competitive university would brag about). You’ll likely have very few member behavior problems because of your selectivity. You’ll have 350 guys begging to be in your chapter each year that you have to say “no” to and have to put on a waiting list. You’ll never have dues collection problems again because you screen your members for eligibility during the selection process (in fact, you could raise your dues and buy that big fraternity RV with your letters on it you've always wanted). You’ll probably win a ton of awards from your school and inter/national headquarters. Sororities will beg to hang out with you because of the caliber of men you're selecting. You’ll be seen as the model for all fraternities across the country. You get the picture.

4 handshakes per week.

Math is fun, isn't it?

Some might argue that this is oversimplified… O.K., that's fair. But let me ask you these two questions.

1. Does your chapter currently have at least 534 names on its Names List? At least 90% of the groups I've talked to across the country would answer, ‘no.’ If that includes you, give this whole 4 handshakes/week a chance and see what it does for you.

2. Does your chapter currently reject 90% of the people it builds solid relationships with? Again, the vast majority of the fraternity chapters I've talked to reject maybe 3-10 people at most each year during their membership selection process. If you were truly operating at a 90% rejection rate as a chapter… now that would be high quality.

The truth is, if this scenario is at least a little bit true but you and four brothers were able to shake hands with 10 guys a week, and you operated on an 80% rejection rate, you could initiate 300 men each year.

The missing link between your current reality and 300 initiates a year is simply the amount of handshakes you make each week and how you build friendships with those people.

How many hands will you shake today?

Set the Mood

Monday, January 12th, 2009

By Matt Mattson

Today's Phired Up recruitment blog post was inspired by this blog post from Seth Godin. If you don't already read Seth everyday like I do, you should. 

Godin states at the beginning of his piece, “Songs about romance don't tell you how to make out, they merely encourage it. It's not the data that people seek, it's the mood.”

This is very true for student organization recruitment. Most people aren't seeking data to sway their lifelong decision to join your fraternity or sorority (or any student group), most are seeking the right mood, feeling, or warm-fuzzy that makes them feel like joining is the right decision for them.

Yet, when I ask most organizations that I work with, “how do you 'sell’ your organization to potential members?” they respond with data…

-We have the best GPA

-We have the biggest house

-We win IM's all the time

-We have leather couches in our living room

-84% of us end up getting good paying jobs

That data is fine, and it is good filler for brochures and websites if you are desperate to use it, but it won't make the 'sale’. No, you need to convince someone to join your organization by helping them experience the feelings of pride, honor, friendship, love, loyalty, kindness, grace, or whatever it feels like to you to be a member. 

I’ll state this more clearly. The reason most people DON't join your organization is because when they imagine themselves as a member, they either feel ambivalent or embarrassed. It's all about that feeling

Do your members exude an aura of pride around them the second they step foot on campus? Do your members believe they're the best, that they’ll only accept the best, and that people should act their best anytime they're around one of your members? When you watch your members' everyday actions, do you get a feeling of pride or do you get a feeling of mediocrity or even disgust? 

Our organizations create a mood around them. You can choose the mood you put out and that can dramatically impact the mood of your entire organization. Next time you walk into a meeting or event, puff out your chest, stand tall, and act like you're James Freakin’ Bond or the most confident man or woman you've ever seen. Choose to be the smiling life of the party. Choose to be helpful, kind, and the most buoyant, personable person in the room. Setting that mood will do more for you than any data you share with a prospective member.

“If you can't measure it, you can't manage it.”

Friday, January 9th, 2009

by Matt Mattson

“If you can't measure it, you can't manage it.” So sayeth the guru of all management gurus, Peter Drucker. It's true you know, and it applies just as much to college student organization recruitment as it does to the bottom line of a Fortune 500 company.

What are you measuring when it comes to recruitment?

Most organizations measure one thing… how many members joined this semester. This is typically how recruitment goals are set (we're going to recruit x members this year), and this is typically the number everyone focuses on. That's an o.k. thing to measure, and it is certainly the bottom line, but it falls a little short. Here's why.

See, there is one huge problem with that measurement… you have no control over it. You can't control how many people join because ultimately it is their decision to join. You can obviously influence their decision, but you can't control it. I like to set goals that have to do with what is in my direct control. Then I know that if I accomplished the goal, I am the one who deserves the credit. If I fail, there are no excuses.

So if it doesn't really make sense to have “# of members who join” as our primary measurable, what should we measure? Here are 15 options that, if measured consistently, might shed some light on your recruitment reality (and allow you to better manage your organization's recruitment success).

1. # of names added to the names list (every day, week, month, semester, year).
2. Which members are adding names to the names list.
3. Where your members are meeting the prospective members. Where they're not successful.
4. How much money you spend on a marketing/advertising method (fliers, mailings, scholarships, t-shirts, etc.) vs. how many names you're adding to your list because of that method.
5. The organizations' attrition rate (lost members). From recruitment through initiation. From initiation through yr. 1. From initiation through graduation.
6. # of potential member interviews per day, per week, per semester (I recently heard a story of a fraternity expansion director who averaged 100 interviews/week (20/day) for 4 weeks and consistently recruited a 50 man colony within that time period because of that schedule.
7. # of attendees at events/activities resulting from Facebook invites, mass E-mails, personal invites, offers of rides.
8. Handshakes per week.
9. Pre-Close conversations per day
10. Bids offered vs. bids accepted
11. Cold calls made per day, week, month.
12. Small activities held per week, month, semester.
13. Referral source success rates (which sources yield highest # of names, meetings, bids, members).
14. Dollars spent on recruitment divided by members recruited per semester.
15. GPA of member after 1 semester of membership cross referenced by the origin of their recruitment (which methods did you recruit them with?).

There are infinite things to measure, but start with something… ideally, something that is in your control. This way you have a chance to actually manage your organization's recruitment success.

Inflatable Gorillas

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Question: What's the best way to attract the best and brightest students on campus to be your brother in a lifelong bond of fraternal friendship?

Question: What's the best way to spend your hard earned money during recruitment?

Question: What's the best way to improve your status amongst faculty and staff on campus?

Question: What's the best way to keep those pesky crows from nesting on your fraternity house?

Answer:

We're kidding. Good luck with recruitment!